The $134 Million Firm that sold the myth of John Fetterman

How a so-called “progressive” consulting firm turned Bernie’s movement into a cash cow and establishment tool.

Have you ever gotten a text or email from a political candidate you never supported, asking you to chip in five bucks to “defend democracy”? Maybe you deleted it. But that message probably didn’t come from the candidate. It may have come from a political consulting firm that repackaged the Bernie movement into a for-profit machine.

One of the biggest names in that business is Middle Seat, a self-described “visionary, persuasive, disruptive, and dynamic” digital firm that built its empire branding establishment politicians as grassroots crusaders. Their website showcases glossy ad reels and testimonials celebrating their “progressive” clients and reads like a leftist wish list: racial justice, climate action, immigrant rights, intersectional feminism. The branding is perfect. The business model is cynical genius, raking in a whopping $134 million since 2017.

At the top of their portfolio is John Fetterman. Middle Seat’s site features multiple campaign videos of the Pennsylvania senator, portraying him as a blue-collar hero standing up to the system. The problem is, once the cameras stopped rolling, Fetterman stood with the very system he claimed to fight, making what appeared to be a sharp right turn to his supporters, but not surprising to those familiar with Fetterman’s record.

Middle Seat’s growing client list raises a serious question: Do they vet their clients? Are they critical about who they sell their branding to, or do they simply offer it to anyone seeking a veneer of leftist populism? The firm claims to be “a full-service media and fundraising firm for progressive causes and candidates,” implying that its work is guided by shared values. Its website even boasts, “We bring our values to work,” and “We build movements that honor the authentic perspectives of our clients.” But do they?

The firm doesn’t just build websites and film ads and profit from selling supporter lists to political clients. Firms like Middle Seat build myths. They provide a costume and a template for candidates to cosplay as populist change-makers, even when their records tell another story.

A major part of that grift comes from what’s known in the industry as list acquisition, the buying, selling, and repackaging of supporter data. It is one of the most profitable aspects of political consulting. Campaigns pay Middle Seat to collect email addresses and donor information, often built with information from everyday people who sign up for political events, petitions, campaign websites, or donate. Those same lists are then resold or rented to other campaigns, meaning that donors who think they are giving to one candidate soon find their inboxes flooded by others they have never supported.

Data sales are big business, and the political consulting class is no exception. It has helped Middle Seat quietly amass millions while claiming to build movements “for the people.”

Firms like Middle Seat build myths. They provide a costume and a template for candidates to cosplay as populist change-makers, even when their records tell another story… It sells rebellion pre-approved for corporate donors.”

Middle Seat’s $134 Million Machine

Campaign consulting is a massive industry, and Middle Seat has made more than $134 million since 2017, according to Federal Election Commission data. Its client list reads like a who’s who of “progressive” politics: Fetterman for PA ($20.7 million), Beto O’Rourke ($18.6 million), Katie Porter ($10.8 million), Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez ($8.6 million), and Bob Casey ($7.6 million).

Top clients also include several Political Action Committees (PACs), such as Leaders We Deserve, MoveOn, Heartland Patriots, and Forward Blue, mostly bellwether PACs within the Democratic Party establishment.

Leaders We Deserve PAC is one of the newest. A PAC founded by David Hogg, which has paid $6.2 million to Middle Seat for digital advertising and media production this election cycle, according to FEC filings. Hogg, the former co-vice chair of the DNC, before being removed by daring to threaten to primary incumbents, now runs the PAC to boost “insurgent” and young progressive candidates across the country. The model is reminiscent of Brand New Congress and Justice Democrats, which led movements in the last decade to unseat entrenched incumbents with anti-establishment candidates.

On paper, it sounds like a bold attempt to challenge the establishment and elect a new generation of unapologetic leaders. In reality, Leaders We Deserve has become part of the same ecosystem it claims to resist, funneling millions into the very firm that built its reputation by repackaging establishment figureheads like Joe Biden (who is boasted on Middle Seat’s website), as daring progressive leaders. With Justice Democrats, one of Middle Seat’s clients, being one of the first PACs to funnel candidates into Middle Seat’s apparatus.

Ironic as it may be, PACs like Leaders We Deserve, Justice Democrats, and Beto O’Rourke’s Powered by People claim to be dedicated to insurgent politics while utilizing the same consulting firm that repackages establishment centrists as edgy revolutionaries.

While the firm does make millions off of creating ads, mailers, text campaigns, and websites, the scale of Middle Seat’s profiteering on its list-sell model is also staggering. Ocasio-Cortez has spent more than $3.7 million on list acquisition from Middle Seat alone. Fetterman paid more than $1.19 million. That means donor money is being spent to buy lists, then used to fundraise from the same lists they just bought, a circular loop of profit and grift for firms like Middle Seat.

“Middle Seat helped sell Fetterman…as a hoodie-wearing, working-class populist who could unite rural voters and disillusioned progressives, leftists, and independents. But long before Middle Seat turned him into a national figure, Fetterman had already built a record that contradicted that image.”

Middle Seat’s founders, Kenneth Pennington and Hector Sigala, worked on Bernie Sanders’ 2016 campaign before briefly joining Our Revolution, the organization born out of the Sanders movement. They took the policies, platforms, and energy that sparked a national call for universal health care, a federal jobs guarantee, and the abolition of ICE, and turned it into a business model: selling faux authenticity to candidates and organizations who could afford it.

Today, they use that model to progressive-wash establishment Democrats like President Joe Biden and John Fetterman, and left-wash messaging for organizations like MoveOn. Middle Seat perfected the tone. Its copy reads like Bernie 2016 with the edges buffed off, just enough fire to inspire, never enough to burn bridges with the DNC. It sells rebellion pre-approved for corporate donors.

John Fetterman as a Brand

At the top of Middle Seat’s portfolio sits John Fetterman, its supposed masterpiece. The firm’s site features multiple campaign videos of the Pennsylvania senator, portraying him as a blue-collar hero standing up to the system.

Middle Seat helped sell Fetterman, the former lieutenant governor of Pennsylvania, as a hoodie-wearing, working-class populist who could unite rural voters and disillusioned progressives, leftists, and independents. But long before Middle Seat turned him into a national figure, Fetterman had already built a record that contradicted that image.

In 2013, while serving as mayor of Braddock, Pennsylvania, Fetterman chased down and detained an unarmed Black jogger at gunpoint after claiming he heard gunfire. The man, Chris Miyares, was completely innocent. No gun was ever found, and Fetterman never faced consequences for the incident, according to reporting by the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette and CNN. Yet this story, which could have derailed any other political career, was largely buried under his rugged, working-class reformer brand.

That brand, of course, would later be polished to perfection. When Fetterman ran for the Senate in 2022, his campaign drew hundreds of thousands of dollars in support from pro-Israel lobbying groups, including the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and its affiliates, according to campaign finance data reviewed by OpenSecrets and The Washington Post. His deep alignment with these donors has been evident in his unwavering support for Israel’s military actions, even when they have drawn international condemnation for human rights violations and credible accusations of carrying out ethnic cleansing and genocide of the Palestinian people.

Fetterman’s pattern of political convenience, from gun-toting mayor to AIPAC-backed senator, shows just how effectively Middle Seat repackaged controversy into credibility. The same candidate who once acted as a self-styled vigilante was rebranded as a progressive everyman fighting for justice.

He ran on popular policies like universal health care, marijuana legalization, and economic justice, only to abandon nearly all of his core issues once elected in a spin to the right that left supporters with whiplash.

Middle Seat sold Fetterman as “a different kind of Democrat,” the anti-establishment antidote to Beltway politics. But the reality looks far different. In the Senate, Fetterman has become the new rotating villain, taking the place of Kyrsten Sinema and Joe Manchin as the Democrat most likely to side with Republicans. He’s become the newest scapegoat for establishment Democrats who want to maintain a veneer of credibility while doing the bidding of the donor class.

(Photo from a promotional video on Middle Seat’s Website)

This week, as Democrats attempted a government shutdown maneuver to protect health care, SNAP, and other social safety-net programs, Fetterman broke ranks and voted in line with the GOP. It is part of a pattern that has infuriated Democratic party loyalists and grassroots supporters alike. Recently, he also demonized anti-ICE protesters and migrants in a post supporting mass deportation.

Just this month, Fetterman became the only Democrat to vote against blocking Donald Trump’s drone strikes on Venezuelan boats in the Caribbean. He has voted to support Israel’s bombardment of Iran, openly dehumanized the Palestinian people, and been outspoken in defending unwavering U.S. support for Israel’s military, including opposing the Leahy Law, which prohibits U.S. aid to governments credibly accused of human rights abuses.

Fetterman’s voting record does not just betray the progressive principles he campaigned on. It exposes how political marketing can completely override political reality, turning the hopes of struggling people into a cash cow.

The problem is not just branding. It is what that branding preys on.

Middle Seat and firms like it build their business on the genuine pain of working-class Americans. Their fundraising scripts tap into housing insecurity, medical debt, and collapsing wages, real crises that millions of people face daily.

A CBS News report this year found that 59 percent of Americans cannot afford a $1,000 emergency expense. A Politico analysis found that when underemployment and true unemployment numbers are included, the functional underemployment rate is closer to 26 percent, nearly one in four people.

And yet, while those same voters are having to choose between food on the table and paying rent, they are being flooded with fundraising appeals written by professional firms promising to “fight for you.”

These appeals rake in millions in small-dollar donations, but much of that money cycles back into the consulting industry itself. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, for example, has raised nearly $20 million this year alone, with much of her campaign’s spending flowing right back into firms like Middle Seat instead of community organizing.

For people like me from places like Appalachia and across the country who come from generational poverty, authenticity is not branding. It is survival. When necessities like health care, stable housing, and good-paying jobs are pipe dreams, Middle Seat’s grift is not just out of touch. It is a form of gaslighting that never delivers results.

That is why the Middle Seat model feels like betrayal. It takes the language of struggle born in real kitchens, picket lines, and shelters, and turns it into a commodity.

John Fetterman is just the latest proof. The man who once sold himself as “a different kind of Democrat” has become a symbol of the old kind, the kind who talks like a populist, votes like a corporatist, and cashes the checks in between.

Consulting firms like Middle Seat turn conviction into content, outrage into email copy, and our very real struggles into fodder for profit. Its story is a mirror for modern corporatized politics, where our desperation for change and revolutionary energy is exploited, watered down, and repackaged into hundreds of millions in revenue, and a pipeline fed directly back into the Democratic Party establishment.

Middle Seat did not invent the grift. It perfected it.

Bullhorn Bulletin is an independent news outlet covering politics, policy, and political movements. I’ve seen behind the curtain in my work as an activist, journalist, campaign advisor, and independent movement leader. We need more voices of people who are outside the elite media beltway to break through the corporatized propaganda machine.

If you can, please consider a paid subscription today to help support my work.